What You Should Know About Apple's Location Services Feature

The relatively short history of computing has seen the prevailing architecture go from centralized (mainframe), to decentralized (client/server), to hosted (remember ASP's), to the latest achievement, the "cloud". Every incarnation had benefits. Mainframes provided access to vast data stores, and managing versions of the software was straightforward. Essentially one copy of the software serviced all of the users. Client/server computing placed more power on the desktop, enabling feature-rich and resource-demanding applications to run with great efficiency. Hosting gave corporations a chance to offload the hard and soft costs of running enterprise applications, freeing corporate resources to be deployed elsewhere. And now, with cloud computing, it all seems to happen like magic. The computing and storage environment is totally transparent to the computing public. In fact, so compelling is this new layer of abstraction between the user and the computing environment that it is easy to forget that "computing" is even involved in the process. Corporations are surely the benefactors of this sea change in computing. But the consumer has been equally endowed with this "embarrassment of riches."

There is a side effect, though, to the transparency of this technical wizardry. And that is complacency on the part of the consumer. It has become so easy to incorporate new technology and accomplish wonderful things, and more often than not we don't question the actions we take and the permissions we give. Yes, there are watchdogs that look out for our interests, but much of their work resides in a technical domain that never reaches the constituency they intend to represent.

So the watchdogs do what they do and the rest of us do what we're told, with the promise of a bigger, better, faster, brighter platform to live our virtual lives on.

To illustrate the point, let's take a look a recent real-world example of the consumer taking his eye off the ball, and the givers of technology taking advantage.

Location Services from Apple is a handy capability of these devices. Location Services determine your present location (or your devices present location) by using a mix of cellular, Wi-Fi and global positioning system data. This can be immensely useful if you are looking for a good restaurant nearby, or a pharmacy or gas station. Yes, there's an app for that!

Apparently, though, app developers have been using Location Services to upload a persons address book, and photo and video streams, without clearly indicating they intend to do so. Apple's rules forbid copying photos and address book data. But the thorough screening process Apple uses to police its app store hasn't prevented them from approving many popular apps that collect that information.

Why do these companies want to copy your photos? It may not be as nefarious as it seems. Some photos store coordinate information. A photo taken with an iPhone, for example, is encoded with the specific location where the photo was taken. This information is useful to an app developer if they provide a service based on where you are at the time. It is not perfect all of the time, but in aggregate, it is incredibly powerful.

Here is the rub.

It is conceivable that an app could combine location data with photo coordinates to put together a map of where an Apple customer has been. And if that app uploads those sources of information to a server somewhere, all bets are off. Apple has no control over how these data are used by a third party app developer. This seems to be a loophole in Apples privacy policy. A customer can consciously decide to keep his photos on his phone, and take steps to do so. But if he finds the Location Services capabilities too powerful and useful to ignore, those photos could end up... anywhere.

The simplicity of consumer technology today has inoculated us against the healthy fear that our privacy is being potentially compromised. These handy and compelling tools seem to come wrapped in a tidy package of trust by default, which are evermore easy to opt into without considering the consequences.

John J. Lawson blogs about consumer Internet privacy, identity and reputation at http://mycyberiq.com/. You can email the author at john@mycyberiq.com.

View the original article here

Components of Apple's Device to Harm Our Environment

The launch of the iPhone 4S in Hong Kong created a chaotic scene at the Apple store there, where thousands turned out hours ahead of time to line up for the latest iOS gadget. The temptation of smartphone is so great that amounts of people rush to purchase it. However Ma Danni says she plans to postpone that long-planned purchase.

The reason is that she recently learned that the device, produced by the technology giant Apple Inc, is made from components coming from suppliers suspected of releasing large amounts of pollutants.

For nearly two years, five Chinese environmental organizations have worked together to help make sure electronics companies' supply chains are managed with an eye toward protecting the environment and to encourage consumers to choose "green" products.

Apple, long the target of critics who contend its suppliers are harming the environment and people's health, met with delegates from the five environmental groups on Tuesday. The occasion let the company discuss its commitment to containing pollutants being released by its suppliers.

We appreciate the large step Apple took away from dodging its duty and toward attaching importance to this issue, said Feng Yongfeng, founder of the Beijing-based Green Beagle, one of the five environmental organizations.

Apple refused to disclose specifics about the meeting, only reasserting its commitment to "maintaining the highest standards for social responsibility throughout its supply chain".

The same day, Apple proposed arranging a conference call to discuss the environmentalists' findings.

Inspectors with the environmental organizations visited 22 plants that are believed to be suppliers of Apple and blamed them for releasing heavy metal sludge, toxic gas and large amounts of other pollutants.

The company was not the sole target of the groups. This year, 29 companies responded to the organizations' complaints about pollution in their supply chains, but Apple is the only that is believed to have been persistently evasive.

Meanwhile, Apple and the groups have expressed different opinions about how transparent the company's ic parts supply chain should be.
Several delegates from the environmental groups said Apple intends to carry on that work in accordance with its own plans and at its own pace and does not want to tell outsiders what it is doing.

Apple showed us its marvelous idea of managing its supply chains, Li Li said, but if it doesn't disclose information about its suppliers, and the time and steps that will be taken to put this into effect, how can the public oversee any of this?

Ma Jun, director of the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, thinks Apple's consumers won't accept the fact that their faddish gadgets are paid for by poisoning the environment, harming communities and sacrificing employee rights.

This article comes from http://www.hqew.net

Dava shares her knowledges on electronic components technologies, which may help you to get more informations about today's electronic products.You can get more informations on electronic components and other developing technologies on her articles.

View the original article here